The jurisprudential issues on which the two imams Ibn Hajar and Al-Badr Al-Aini differed in their commentaries on Sahih Al-Bukhari regarding sales and Salam

Document Type : Academic research papers

Authors

1 Ain shams

2 Professor of Islamic studies- Department of Arabic, Faculty of Women for Arts, Science & Education, Ain Shams University, Egypt

3 Department of Arabic, Faculty of Women for Arts, Science & Education, Ain Shams University, Egypt

Abstract

We find that we are in the first question, and its title is: How much of the option is permissible? , there was a difference between Ibn Hajar and Al-Ayni
n the period of option is only three days in the sale
The opinion of Imam Ibn Hajar was that the period of option is according to the time required by the interest and is not restricted to three days, as for Al-Badr Al-Ayni, his opinion is that the option is three days and does not exceed that, but we prefer Al-Badr Al-Ayni’s opinion that the option is three days because the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace, considered the number three in the option, so it is recommended as the Prophet, may God bless him an
Al-Rukban
Al-Badr Al-Ayni’s opinion is that it is permissible to receive

In the second issue, and its title is the prohibition of receiving Al-Rukban, Ibn Hajar’s opinion was that it is disliked to receive Al-Rukban and that its owner is disobedient and has committed a sin because of the corruption and loss of rights in it, while

In the third issue, which is the ruling on selling palm trees before their ripeness appears, the opinions of the jurists differed between the permissibility of selling the fruit, it was said that its ripeness appears absolutely and without a condition, which is the opinion of the Hanafis, and between the permissibility of selling before its ripeness appears with the

Keywords

Main Subjects

Buhūth
Volume 5, Issue 3
Social Sciences and Humanities and Languages
March 2025
Pages 226-249

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics